Embryonic Stem Cell Controvery Re-emerges in Missouri Senate Race

Clayton Missouri Senate debate

One of the hottest issues in Claire McCaskill’s 2006 US Senate campaign has re-emerged in her re-election bid of 2012.
Embryonic stem cell research.
The issue also produced one of the cycle’s most memorable commercial.
Actor Michael J. Fox, shaking badly from Parkinson’s disease, started directly into a camera then asking for help in promoting embryonic stem cell research, which he and other think may help lead to a cure, for people who suffer from the disease.
“In Missouri you can elect Claire McCaskill, who shares my hopes for cures,” Fox said in the commercial.
“I’m proud of the work that’s being done in Missouri in terms of this important research,” said McCaskill Thursday night during the debate, “and I think it is important that it continue.”
Her Republican rival, Rep. Todd Akin, said he supports stem cell research. There is a difference.
“There is the embryonic stem cell part, which I don’t support,” Akin said Thursday.
The conservative Congressman says stem cell research, “is just phenomenal”.
Akin, however, believes that life starts at the instant of conception.
Embryonic stem cell opponents, like Akin, think the use of discarded embryos in stem cell research destroy an unborn life.
He thinks stem cell research can progress without destroying embryos.
“There was just a major breakthrough last week that showed you don’t even need the embryonic because they found a way to make the cells, what they call ‘plastic’.
Akin is not referring to artificial cells made of plastic.
In this contest, the scientific community uses the word ‘plastic’ to mean anything can be made of anything.
When someone refers to a cell being ‘plastic’ they are saying the cell has the versatility to be converted for other purposes in the body. A ew cell to help the heart, or a vein or any other part of the body needing repair.
Akin may be referring to a new scientific claim. A research team at Weill Cornell Medical College claims they think amniotic fluids taken from a pregnant women, with her permission midway thru her pregnancy, provides an alternative.
The researchers say they have discovered a way the cells from the fluid can be triggered in the laboratory to be converted to another use.
Professor Kenneth Peterson of the University of Kansas School of Medicine is not so sure.
“The evidence is still out,” said Peterson in an interview with KMBC TV.
Peterson takes issue with another statement Akin made on the issue during the debate.
“You can take an adult cell and make it do any kind of function of another cell,” Akin stated.
“Adult stem cells is a misleading term. In science, an adult cell is one that has matured. it does not refer to a cell in a human over the age of 21.
Newborn babies can have adult cells, cells that are developed, and mature.
Peterson also challenged Akin’s claim there is no longer a need for embryonic stem cell research.
He says some adult cells that seem to be able to replicate an embryonic cell’s ability to adapt, have not been researched completely. Peterson believes more discovery into the mysteries of embryonic stems cells, altered matured cells and other potential alternatives still need to be explored.

About these ads

3 Responses

  1. Your information is incorrect – Akin was right and you Mr. Mahoney are wrong. This year’s Nobel Prize in Medicine has just won for making adult stem cells pluripotent thus making embryonic stem research no longer needed. There have been absolutely NO promising cures from embryos but dozens coming from adult stem cells. A major research company using embryonic cells has just recently announced it was closing down its stem cell program – the company – GeronCorp. You need to get your facts straight and stop lying to the public. Akin was right and you need to report your error.

    • Mr. akin referred to a break through from the last week. That was the paper he was referring to.. He did not mention the Nobel Prize winners, which I was aware of when I reported on this.
      Thank you for writing.

      • If you were aware of this positive breakthru why not report it. Also, why not report that companies are shutting down embryonic research. Instead you just reported on what you wanted the public to know – why did you not report ALL the facts. A lie by omission is still a lie. You were not being fair to BOTH sides of this issue; you only wanted McCaskill to look good. What has happened to journalist integrity – letting the public decide for themselves based on the facts. You wanted to make Akin look stupid and sway public opinion. I don’t believe reporters should be doing this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 97 other followers

%d bloggers like this: