Cigarette Tax Debate, Rivals Square Off in Columbia

Opponents and proponents of a tobacco tax hike on the November ballot are making their cases to voters.
Missouri Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association Executive Director Ron Leone (left) and Representative Chris Kelly (D-Columbia) debate Proposition B in a forum hosted by the Missouri Student Association.
Proponents of Proposition B say it would generate an estimated 283 million dollars for education and smoking cessation programs, by raising taxes on tobacco products.
Executive Director of the Missouri Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association, Ron Leone, opposes Proposition B. He argues there is no guarantee any additional money raised would go to education.
“While this will in fact put more money into the kitty, that’s no guarantee that current appropriations won’t be reduced by the same amount. So when you have … let’s say this generates $100 million dollars for higher ed, let’s just use that as an example … There’s no guarantee that $100 million dollars of current appropriations won’t be appropriated somewhere else to some other use or purpose.”
Representative Chris Kelly (D-Columbia) argues in favor of B, and says no education dollars will be shifted elsewhere in the budget any time soon. “There is absolutely nobody in the generally assembly who is going to supplant any current general revenue dollar in higher education, or in elementary and secondary education. It will be almost impossible to get that done, politically, because they overwhelmingly understand the problem and Democrats and Republicans alike will all oppose it.”
Leone says his organization supported legislation in the last session that would have raised tobacco taxes to a lesser amount, but it did not pass. He says Proposition B raises those taxes too much. “Can you imagine if we were having this discussion about anything else? Whether it was alcohol, whether it was clothing, income tax, business tax, can you imagine somebody standing up here and saying forty-six percent is too low? Thirty-seven percent is too low, and we need to raise it another 760 percent?”
Kelly says those comparisons don’t work. “I wouldn’t compare tobacco to any other product. I would compare it to any other poison. If you’re going to talk about ingestible poisons, I think you can make a reasonable argument that you ought to tax it them different than, for instance, potatoes.”

One Response

  1. Reblogged this on KC Education Enterprise.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: