Star Editorial Questions CEE-Trust KC School Plan

Top Missouri education officials are scheduled to work this week on a plan that could shape the future of Kansas City Public Schools and other struggling districts.

Education Commissioner Chris Nicastro has sought suggestions from the public and interested groups and, controversially, an Indianapolis-based firm that supports school choice. She hopes to recommend a plan to the Board of Education when it meets Feb. 18.

Nicastro and the board would make a serious mistake by adopting wholesale the dramatic changes recommended by CEE-Trust of Indianapolis, especially when better options exist.

While some of its prescriptions are on the mark — universal pre-kindergarten, for example, and more decision-making authority at the school building level — CEE-Trust proposes making Kansas City the site of a first-of-its-kind experiment.

It would dismantle the Kansas City Public Schools and replace it with a new entity that would select and support a system of independent nonprofit school operators. Those chosen to run schools would decide on curriculum, teacher pay, school year calendars and school culture. A “community schools office” would take care of central functions such as transportation.

The troubled history of Kansas City’s urban school district demands new thinking and more accountability. But the CEE-Trust plan is highly speculative. It relies on multiple as-yet-unknown entities to create and sustain great schools.

Kansas City has a strong nonprofit and foundation network. But does the community have the capacity to sustain enough excellent nonprofit boards to make sure these schools thrive and serve the interests of children and their families? Sustained board leadership has been a challenge for many charter schools in Kansas City.

We also question whether a collection of independently run schools, some of which would enroll students through a lottery, would appeal to families looking at Kansas City as a place to live. Strong neighborhood schools in a stable district seem a more reliable option.

The Kansas City Public Schools has for the most part also failed to provide that option. But while the district’s overall performance is unacceptable, some schools perform well.

Most plans submitted to the state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education recognize that dichotomy, and correctly propose that interventions take place at the building level as opposed to dismantling entire school systems.

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2014/02/08/4806407/dont-embrace-experimental-overhaul.html#storylink=cpy

There are no comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: